<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Simplicity sucks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nnyman.com/personal/2006/12/10/simplicity-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nnyman.com/personal/2006/12/10/simplicity-sucks/</link>
	<description>Niko Nyman's blog on shifting topics.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Niko</title>
		<link>http://www.nnyman.com/personal/2006/12/10/simplicity-sucks/#comment-10522</link>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nnyman.com/personal/2006/12/10/simplicity-sucks/#comment-10522</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Using a mobile phone as an example of a software application (that's what it is after all) I would say the consumer thinking goes along those lines: a simple phone is less likely to break. Whether that is &lt;em&gt;true&lt;/em&gt; is altogether a different story.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using a mobile phone as an example of a software application (that&#8217;s what it is after all) I would say the consumer thinking goes along those lines: a simple phone is less likely to break. Whether that is <em>true</em> is altogether a different story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina Aspiala</title>
		<link>http://www.nnyman.com/personal/2006/12/10/simplicity-sucks/#comment-10510</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina Aspiala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nnyman.com/personal/2006/12/10/simplicity-sucks/#comment-10510</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm. On the other hand, when presented by something complex and something simple in a place like Ikea or Lidl, I'll pick the simpler thing because it's less likely to break.
Also, does this theory also apply to software? If I offer my grandmother the choice of typing a letter on Word or on TextEdit, I bet she'd prefer the latter. I also hear constant complaints about people "just looking for a SIMPLE phone."&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. On the other hand, when presented by something complex and something simple in a place like Ikea or Lidl, I&#8217;ll pick the simpler thing because it&#8217;s less likely to break.
Also, does this theory also apply to software? If I offer my grandmother the choice of typing a letter on Word or on TextEdit, I bet she&#8217;d prefer the latter. I also hear constant complaints about people &#8220;just looking for a SIMPLE phone.&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
