<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Authentic N90 customer feedback</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nnyman.com/personal/2006/07/26/authentic-n90-customer-feedback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nnyman.com/personal/2006/07/26/authentic-n90-customer-feedback/</link>
	<description>Niko Nyman&#039;s blog on shifting topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:12:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peppe</title>
		<link>http://www.nnyman.com/personal/2006/07/26/authentic-n90-customer-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-2506</link>
		<dc:creator>Peppe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 07:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nnyman.com/personal/2006/07/26/authentic-n90-customer-feedback/#comment-2506</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;...being one of those aforementioned N80 owners, I just wonder what the hell is going on with approved Nokia phones service and repairing companies: none of them is willing to update my N80. The word is on the street I&#039;m not the only one. Niko might have a few words on this one as well. Oh, he already has had a few words... :-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyway, I just had to clear that &quot;NOT this one!&quot;-topic. I just feel - after a couple of months - that N80 is very much an underachievement. In a scale from 0 to 10 it&#039;s just barely a six. It&#039;s very buggy (for example, right now sending an SMS takes more than a minute, which is why I wanted to update it), clumsy to use, physically it feels like a secondhand Lada (making clunky rattling physical noises in your ears beyond lunacy whilst talking, scratching itself almost automatically thanks to its sliding case), the camera, although being a 3-megapixel-thing is much, much worse than my half dead &#039;98 Digital Ixus (2 megapix)... oh, speaking about the camera: the ridiculous switch next to optics is just worth a batteryless dildo, actually, it must be courtesy of the Krasnojarsk Lada Factory. NOT to mention the stupid themes with a serious lack of contrast: it&#039;s practically impossible to use it in bright sunlight with your goggles on.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ok, at least the last one was sorted: I downloaded the &quot;White&quot; theme from s60.com and almost immediately wondered &quot;why wasn&#039;t this on board right from the beginning?&quot; Then I remembered what a bunch of asscheek acne suffering overweight übernerds the developing team must be: they quite rarely encounter sunlight. And they do neither send text messages nor talk. They IRC. Which must be why the original development team didn&#039;t notice the aforementioned issues.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s easy to go bashing but what can you do when all the good things fit in one short sentence: The screen looks good and it has a 802.11 plus a black case. The wrist band broke after only a month of use. Oops, that&#039;s bashing again, dammit. :-D&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;being one of those aforementioned N80 owners, I just wonder what the hell is going on with approved Nokia phones service and repairing companies: none of them is willing to update my N80. The word is on the street I&#8217;m not the only one. Niko might have a few words on this one as well. Oh, he already has had a few words&#8230; :-)</p>

<p>Anyway, I just had to clear that &#8220;NOT this one!&#8221;-topic. I just feel &#8211; after a couple of months &#8211; that N80 is very much an underachievement. In a scale from 0 to 10 it&#8217;s just barely a six. It&#8217;s very buggy (for example, right now sending an SMS takes more than a minute, which is why I wanted to update it), clumsy to use, physically it feels like a secondhand Lada (making clunky rattling physical noises in your ears beyond lunacy whilst talking, scratching itself almost automatically thanks to its sliding case), the camera, although being a 3-megapixel-thing is much, much worse than my half dead &#8216;98 Digital Ixus (2 megapix)&#8230; oh, speaking about the camera: the ridiculous switch next to optics is just worth a batteryless dildo, actually, it must be courtesy of the Krasnojarsk Lada Factory. NOT to mention the stupid themes with a serious lack of contrast: it&#8217;s practically impossible to use it in bright sunlight with your goggles on.</p>

<p>Ok, at least the last one was sorted: I downloaded the &#8220;White&#8221; theme from s60.com and almost immediately wondered &#8220;why wasn&#8217;t this on board right from the beginning?&#8221; Then I remembered what a bunch of asscheek acne suffering overweight übernerds the developing team must be: they quite rarely encounter sunlight. And they do neither send text messages nor talk. They IRC. Which must be why the original development team didn&#8217;t notice the aforementioned issues.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s easy to go bashing but what can you do when all the good things fit in one short sentence: The screen looks good and it has a 802.11 plus a black case. The wrist band broke after only a month of use. Oops, that&#8217;s bashing again, dammit. :-D</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niko</title>
		<link>http://www.nnyman.com/personal/2006/07/26/authentic-n90-customer-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-2501</link>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nnyman.com/personal/2006/07/26/authentic-n90-customer-feedback/#comment-2501</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Agree on all counts. And yes, bashing is rather easy, but I feel there&#039;s way too little of it. If something is broken, it doesn&#039;t get better by repeating how good it is. Or are you saying this is the best we can get? ;)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As a side note, I had another Nokia moment today: a friend asked what would be a good model to replace her four year old phone, and instantly the three N80 owners in the table shouted &quot;NOT this one!&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree on all counts. And yes, bashing is rather easy, but I feel there&#8217;s way too little of it. If something is broken, it doesn&#8217;t get better by repeating how good it is. Or are you saying this is the best we can get? ;)</p>

<p>As a side note, I had another Nokia moment today: a friend asked what would be a good model to replace her four year old phone, and instantly the three N80 owners in the table shouted &#8220;NOT this one!&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommi Vilkamo</title>
		<link>http://www.nnyman.com/personal/2006/07/26/authentic-n90-customer-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-2498</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommi Vilkamo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nnyman.com/personal/2006/07/26/authentic-n90-customer-feedback/#comment-2498</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Uh. Seem that the devices are becoming too complex and too scary for normal earthlings - I mean other than us techno-overlords.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I wonder what we should do. I guess there are no easy solutions. It&#039;s easier to bash bad user experience than to make it good, especially as there are so many design constraints in mobile devices.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh. Seem that the devices are becoming too complex and too scary for normal earthlings &#8211; I mean other than us techno-overlords.</p>

<p>I wonder what we should do. I guess there are no easy solutions. It&#8217;s easier to bash bad user experience than to make it good, especially as there are so many design constraints in mobile devices.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

